Christ, the ballast of Christian community

On the morning of August 10, 1628, the Swedish warship Vasa set sail from its harbor in the port of Stockholm. Built on the order of the Lutheran King Gustavus Adolphus to aid the war efforts against Catholic Poland, the Vasa was a true flagship, one of the most formidable maritime vessels ever created. She was stunningly adorned, with an ornamental beauty yet to be seen on a ship of her size. But she had to be powerful, for the tactics of naval warfare in the Baltics were changing. For this reason, the King called for an unprecedented armament, and the Vasa set sail for battle with a double deck of 72 cannons.

What is distinctively Christian in Christian Community?

In these days of a waning pandemic, many Catholics feel adrift amidst the flotsam and jetsam of ecclesial life. Church closures and sacramental restrictions are only the tip of the iceberg; what lies beneath is an unabating sense of isolation and existential confusion. But despite these hardships, we have been given a new opportunity to reflect once again on the question of community. Though constantly liable to the superficial, the word “community” strikes at the heart of the Christian mystery of God. For this reason, one of the first acts of the Church in a post-pandemic world is to reflect anew on what is distinctively Christian about Christian community.

First and foremost, community arises out of an encounter with Jesus Christ. This is significant and not to be overlooked, because it relegates all other relationships to a secondary and subsequent position. In 10 years of marriage preparation, I have found this a most challenging truth to communicate; that the uniqueness of Christian marriage lies not in the qualitative intensity of the love of spouses, but in the infinitely mysterious love of the Trinity. As Pope Benedict XVI writes, the encounter with Jesus Christ, truly risen from the dead, completely redefines our understanding of love:

“Jesus’ resurrection was about breaking out into an entirely new form of love, into a life that is no longer subject to the law of dying and becoming but lies beyond it a life that opens up a new dimension of human existence. Therefore, the resurrection of Jesus is not an isolated event that we could set aside as something limited to the past … [Rather], a new possibility of human existence is attained that affects everyone and that opens up a future, a new kind of future, for mankind.”1

The divine love of Christ, then, is not supplemental to the more immediate loves of our worldly life; it is essential and foundational. The love of a friend or spouse, children or parents, all find their origin, purpose and grounds in the love of God discovered in Jesus. Within the historical fact of Christ, we encounter God not just as one love among others, but because he himself is love, the very structure of love is reconstituted around him.

The divine love of Christ, then, is not supplemental to the more immediate loves of our worldly life; it is essential and foundational.

Part of the spiritual poverty of our age is that we have relegated the love of God to this accidental sphere; that is to say, we can opt in and out of this love through the preferential option of a Christian lifestyle. This seems to be one of the main reasons why the majority of Catholics don’t practice their faith: it’s not simply that it’s inconvenient, it’s that it’s inessential. We find here then a deeper problem: that love in the post-modern world has been naturalized. The naturalization of love, a baseline presumption in our day, means the following: that the loves of my life, that vast relational nexus of family, friendship, and community, exists autonomously and completely on its own. With this as the starting point, the logical conclusion is that relationships have no need for the supernatural.

This illusion of self-fulfillment in naturalized love is alive and well in the Church. Take for example, the commonplace language of “building community.” Though often employed by well-intentioned people, why does the phrase strike us as empty and uninspiring? Because it insinuates community as something fabricated and man-made. In other words, when we build community, we do so on a natural level alone. We therefore need to recover the basic truth of Christian community – namely, that God, and not us, is the primary agent; he is the one who actually builds. Borrowing a word from Tolkien, human beings are by nature “subcreators” and thereby secondary in the line of causality. We build community only in and through God, himself being the exemplar of community. 

An Encounter with a Concrete Event

Returning then to the question of what is distinctively Christian about Christian community, our answer is forthright: that it arises from and exists completely for the encounter with the risen lord Jesus Christ, the event of the love of God. As Julián Carrón explains, the true encounter with God always occurs within the event of Christ:

“Christ is not an idea or a thought, but a real event that bursts into my life. I encounter something that has something within and that magnetizes my being. Jesus Christ, that man of two thousand years ago, is immanent, becomes present, under the veil, under the aspect of a different humanity.”2

The event of Jesus Christ, which we call the redemptive Incarnation, is then the precondition of all Christian community. This means that those who have not encountered him through the event of his life, death, and resurrection are not capable of sharing in the truth of Christian communion. If the Incarnation is the key to understanding the true form of Christian community, then community itself must mirror the mystery of Trinitarian communion in Christ. 

We oftentimes think of the encounter with Jesus as elevating the experience of human life, transcending the world in grace and drawing us up towards the life of heaven. And this is indeed true, but it’s only half of the story. In becoming man, God concretized himself in humanity. In this way, Jesus grounds us in the world, anchoring us to the physical. The gift of grace does not turn us into angels; it makes use more human. This humanizing aspect of grace reveals the deeper Christian truth: that Christ is the concretissimum, the most concrete thing in reality, as Hans Urs von Balthasar says. The essence of Christian discipleship is then not the abstraction of ideas, but the concretization of love. In that case, we need to stop speaking abstractly about community and begin living it in a concrete and human form. 

Christ as Ballast

The Vasa never made it to Poland. In fact, she never made it out of Stockholm. Travelling three quarters of a mile, her maiden voyage ended in utter catastrophe as she collapsed and sunk. Over three centuries later, in 1961, the Vasa was salvaged from the bottom of the Stockholm harbor with remarkable integrity. It can now be visited, almost in its entirety, in the Vasamuseet. Though at the time of the wreck the inquest was inconclusive, we now know the simple reason why the great Vasa sunk – she was inherently unstable because her center of gravity was too high. 

Every ship has a ballast, a weight placed at the bottom of the hull to keep her steady. Though the Vasa had a ballast, it was insufficient to keep her in balance. The lesson holds for the little barges of Christian community; they need to be held steady by a ballast of sufficient weight. Jesus Christ, the concretissimum, is the ballast of the Church, and thus all Christian community. Hidden within her inner life is this ballast, the secret to how she holds stable amidst the violent winds of ideology and the constant mutiny of sin. 

The modern fresco of Ascension of the Lord in church Santuario Maria Auxiliadora i Sant Josep by Fidel Trias Pages and Raimon Roca (1966).

This is of particular importance now for our local Church. Hearkening the aquiline call to embrace this apostolic moment, we are launching out of the modalities of Christendom and into the new waters of the post-Christian world. These waters are new but not unfamiliar, for they look similar to the Church’s passage through the ancient world. As Pope Benedict XVI suggests, the success of that ancient missionary endeavor lay not in the execution of strategic planning, but in the community established with Christ as ballast: 

“The early Church, after the end of the apostolic time, developed a relatively reduced missionary activity; she had no strategy for announcing the faith to the pagans … and yet even so this time became a period of great missionary success. The conversion of the ancient world to Christianity was not the result of a planned action but of the proof of the faith in the world as it was made visible in the life of Christians and in the community of the Church. Humanly speaking, the real invitation from experience to experience, and nothing more, was the missionary power of the early Church.”3

The future of the Church is to be found in concretely lived small communities, ones that are decidedly Christian in character. The neighborhoods of cultural Catholicism have faded away, as have their classical expressions in parochial life. In this great apostolic moment, when the Church awakens anew to mission in a post-Christian world, may she be mindful that community is not a means to mission, but the heart of mission itself. For if she were to load her ship with too much armament for evangelization, her endeavor may be subject, like that of the Vasa, to capsize. With the ballast of Christ, she remains grounded in the truth of her existence – the community in God. And for that reason alone, no matter the storms that may come, true ships of Christian community will always arrive safely in eternal harbors.

1 Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth: Part Two: Holy Week:
From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection
San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011, 244.

2 J. Carrón, The Radiance in Your Eyes: What Saves us from

Human Adventure Books: Tampa and Denver, 2020, 64.

3 J. Ratzinger, The Yes of Jesus Christ: Spiritual Exercises in
Faith, Hope, and Love
San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005, 31.

COMING UP: Banned books: Pushing back against the new ideology

Sign up for a digital subscription to Denver Catholic!

How would you know if you were being brainwashed? When something plainly false — contrary to common sense and right reason — is so constantly forced on you and you are not allowed to question it, it’s a good indication. This is the nature of ideology: imposing a position without truly establishing it or allowing it to be criticized. We have seen that something clearly opposed to the basics of scientific fact, such as the nature of sex as male and female, can be forced quickly upon American society through the influence of media and public education. And, perhaps not too surprisingly, even something as clear as 2+2=4 has been called into question by progressive educators, such as Dr. Rochelle Gutierrez, turning it into a sign of alleged oppression.  

In our time, dystopian novels have become reality. George Orwell best described the use of ideology in modern political regimes through doublethink, newspeak, and thoughtcrime. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, the main character, Winston Smith, is coerced to accept that 2+2=5, showing his allegiance to ideology over reality. Orwell speaks of the way ideology gains power over the mind: “The Party is not interested in the overt act: the thought is all we care about. We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them.” This domination does not broker any opposition: “It is intolerable . . .  that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be.” If the truth can circulate freely, then ideology will fail.  

You might ask how the acceptance of ideology differs from accepting the mystery of faith, which requires our obedience to God. A key difference is that God’s revelation makes sense even while beyond reason. God does not shut down our thinking but wants us to ask questions and continue to come to know him and his creation throughout our lives. Faith cannot contradict reason because they both come from God, from his gifts of revelation and creation. You know you are facing ideology, however, when it refuses any discussion of contrary views. Catholics have been accused of hate for refusing to go along with the new ideology of human sexuality. This ideology claims to speak truly of the reality of human life, although it doesn’t add up, contradicting itself and the clear facts of science. The fight for the future focuses on speaking the truth. Without the ability to think, discuss, and read freely, it will be hard to respond to the ideological wave overwhelming us. 

Throughout the country, however, great books and humanities programs are being shut down for their emphasis on the Western tradition. Cornell West, an African American philosopher at Harvard, writing with Jeremy Tate, speaks of the spiritual tragedy of one American university closing down its classics department: “Yet today, one of America’s greatest Black institutions, Howard University, is diminishing the light of wisdom and truth that inspired [Frederick] Douglass, [Martin Luther] King and countless other freedom fighters. . . . Academia’s continual campaign to disregard or neglect the classics is a sign of spiritual decay, moral decline and a deep intellectual narrowness running amok in American culture.” For West and Tate, cancelling the Western canon shuts down the central conversation of the pursuit of wisdom that touches every culture.  

Canceling the pursuit of wisdom hits at the integrity of our culture itself, as Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, another dystopian novel, focused on saving books from the fire set on wiping them out, explains: “If you don’t want a man unhappy politically, don’t give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one. Better yet, give him none.” Books proved hostile in this all-too-real futuristic American society portrayed by Bradbury, undermining the state of contended distraction provided by an omnipresent virtual reality. The fight for truth necessarily entails the books we read and teach.  

In our current cancel culture, Catholics too are being silenced for speaking about reality. Amazon recently cancelled Ryan T. Anderson, who studied at Princeton and Notre Dame and now directs the Ethics and Public Policy Center, blocking the sale of its book on its platform for questioning transgender ideology. The book, When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Movement (Encounter Books, 2018), provides a well-researched and thought-out response to the movement overturning common sense and millennia of acquired wisdom. Even more than that, Anderson shows how we are experimenting on our children, subjecting them to practices of hormone therapy and surgery that have not been proven safe or effective. Anderson provides evidence of ideology at work, through its coercive attempt to force us to accept what contradicts clear scientific evidence: “At the heart of the transgender moment are radical ideas about the human person — in particular, that people are what they claim to be regardless of contrary evidence” (29).  

Anderson does not deny the need to help those who suffer from gender dysphoria, although the heart of the books focuses on whether or not we are willing to accept reality and to help others to do so. As Anderson explains, “determining reality is the heart of the matter, and here too we find contradictions … Is our gender biologically determined and immutable or self-created and changeable? … At the core of the ideology is the radical claim that feelings determine reality. From this idea come extreme demands for society to play along with subjective reality claims. Trans ideologues ignore contrary evidence and competing interests; they disparage alternative practices; and they aim to muffle skeptical voices and shut down disagreement. The movement has to keep patching and shoring up its beliefs, policing the faithful, coercing the heretics and punishing apostates, because as soon as its furious efforts flag for a moment or someone successfully stands up to it, the whole charade is exposed. That’s what happens when your dogmas are so contrary to obvious, basic, everyday truths” (47-48). Not only philosophers like Anderson, but many educators, doctors, scientists, and politicians have been cancelled for standing up to the blatant falsehoods of this ideology. 

Does 2+2=5? Is a man a man and a woman a woman? No matter the effect of hormones and surgeries, every cell in the body points to the biological reality of sex, along with a myriad of other physical and emotional traits. Shutting down study and debate does not get to the heart of the matter, the truth of reality and the way to help those who suffer. The ideology does not truly focus on tolerance of others or creating reasonable accommodations, as it seeks to impose itself and coerce us. The reinterpretation of Title IX manifests an “Orwellian fiat” by which sex discrimination, meant to protect women, now becomes a means to discriminate against them: “The Women’s Liberation Front highlights the strange transformation of Title IX into a means to deny privacy, safety, education opportunity, and equality to women” (190). Anderson’s book provides an essential overview of the goals of the transgender movement and how to respond to it from a philosophical and scientific perspective. We should not allow the book to be cancelled! 

The goal of this new ideology is not simply to accept and tolerate a particular position, but, as Orwell recognized, to change us. It constitutes an attempt to redefine what it means to be a human being and to change the way we think about reality. Anything standing in the way will be cancelled or even burned. The quick success of this movement, and other ideologies as well, should make us pause. Do we want our children to think freely and wisely or simply to conform to what is imposed on them without question?  

As Catholics, we are called to think in conformity with faith and reason, upholding the truth, even when inconvenient. We are called to continue to form our own minds and accept the reality of how God made us and how he calls us into relationship with him, as the true source of overcoming suffering and difficulty. If you are uninformed and unable to judge rightly and logically, you are more likely to become prey to the new ideology, especially as enforced by government control and big business. We need Catholic freedom fighters, those willing, with charity, to stop the burning of the great ideas and the cancelling of our own faith.  

Photo by Fred Kearney on Unsplash